Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9845321rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0524865lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9845321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441633lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9845321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1301732lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9845321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2698651lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9845321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0450363lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:dateCreated1999-2-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:abstractTextDigital computed tomographic (CT) data are widely used in three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction of bone geometry and density features for 3-D) modeling purposes. During in vivo CT data acquisition the number of scans must be limited in order to protect patients from the risks related to X-ray absorption. Aim of this work is to automatically define, given a finite number of CT slices, the scanning plan which returns the optimal 3-D) reconstruction of a bone segment from in vivo acquired CT images. An optimization algorithm based on a Discard-Insert-Exchange technique has been developed. In the proposed method the optimal scanning sequence is searched by minimizing the overall reconstruction error of a two-dimensional (2-D) prescanning image: an anterior-posterior (AP) X-ray projection of the bone segment. This approach has been validated in vitro on three different femurs. The 3-D reconstruction errors obtained through the optimization of the scanning plan on the 2-D) prescanning images and on the corresponding 3-D data sets have been compared. Two-dimensional and 3-D data sets have been reconstructed by linear interpolation along the longitudinal axis. Results show that direct 3-D optimization yields root mean square reconstruction errors which are only 4%-7% lower than the 2-D-optimized plan, thus proving that 2-D-optimization provides a good suboptimal scanning plan for 3-D reconstruction. Further on, 3-D reconstruction errors given by the optimized scanning plan and a standard radiological protocol for long bones have been compared. Results show that the optimized plan yields 20%-50% lower 3-D reconstruction errors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:issn0278-0062lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CappelloAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZannoniCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VicecontiMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:volume17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:pagination663-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9845321-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9845321-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9845321-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9845321-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9845321-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:articleTitleOptimal CT scanning plan for long-bone 3-D reconstruction.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:publicationTypeLetterlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9845321pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed