Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9771181rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015131lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9771181lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033487lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9771181lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1519249lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9771181lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9771181lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0209337lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9771181lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205263lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9771181lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439831lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9771181lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0348080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:dateCreated1998-10-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:abstractTextWe have assessed the effect of two induction agents on tracheal intubating conditions after rocuronium 0.6 mg.kg-1 in unpremedicated patients undergoing simulated rapid sequence induction. Following pre-oxygenation, anaesthesia was induced with propofol up to 2.5 mg.kg-1 (n = 35) or etomidate 0.3 mg.kg-1 (n = 36), and further increments as required. After loss of verbal contact, cricoid pressure was applied and rocuronium was injected. Laryngoscopy was performed at 45 s and intubation attempted at 60 s after rocuronium had been given. Ninety-four per cent of patients in the propofol group had clinically acceptable (good or excellent) intubating conditions compared to only 75% in the etomidate group (p = 0.025). Owing to coughing, one patient in the etomidate group could not be intubated on the first attempt. A greater pressor response also followed intubation after induction with etomidate. We conclude that etomidate and rocuronium alone cannot be recommended for intubation at 60 s under rapid sequence induction conditions.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:issn0003-2409lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BiswasAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MahajanR PRPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SkinnerH JHJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:volume53lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:pagination702-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9771181-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:articleTitleEvaluation of intubating conditions with rocuronium and either propofol or etomidate for rapid sequence induction.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:affiliationNottingham City Hospital NHS Trust, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9771181pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9771181lld:pubmed