Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9638029rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0022885lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9638029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392366lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9638029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9638029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0884358lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9638029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1880177lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9638029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2346689lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9638029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1510824lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9638029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1550025lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:dateCreated1998-7-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of the present study was to compare the aerobic contribution of the Wingate anaerobic test by increasing the test load and power output.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:issn0022-4707lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ErgeneNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KaraMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GökbelHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UçokKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BedizC SCSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CikrikçiEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:volume38lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:pagination30-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9638029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9638029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9638029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9638029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9638029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9638029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9638029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:articleTitleComparison of the aerobic contributions to Wingate anaerobic tests performed with two different loads.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Selçuk University, Konya, Turkey.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9638029pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed