Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:954182rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:954182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032105lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:954182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680730lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:954182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:954182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:954182lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1148554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:dateCreated1976-11-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:abstractTextTwo commercially available kits for determining blood ammonia were compared, an enzymatic method requiring a sample volume of 100mul and a nonenzymatic method requiring 1 ml of sample. Calibration curves for both kits were linear to 270 mumol/l, however correlation studies on plasma samples revealed a lack of agreement between methods (r equal to 0.825, Y equal to 0.76X +51). Improved correlation occurs when protein interference is eliminated from the enzymatic procedure. Finally, the nonenzymatic method is modified to accommodate 100 mul of sample and compared to the original method.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:issn0009-9120lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SampsonE JEJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DemersL MLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:pagination192-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:954182-H...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:954182-E...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:954182-A...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:954182-I...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:954182-M...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:954182-S...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:year1976lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:articleTitleA comparative study of micro-ammonia determinations in plasma using two different methods.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:954182pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed