Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9503554rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0699870lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9503554lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010592lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9503554lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0427728lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9503554lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1313904lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9503554lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1404117lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9503554lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1510992lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:dateCreated1998-5-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:abstractTextThis retrospective study served to examine the correlation between the degree of cyclosporin (CyA) exposure, as estimated by a single pharmacokinetic (PK) profile performed at 1 week post-transplant, and the outcome of 290 consecutive renal transplants performed over a 6-year period. For this retrospective analysis patients were stratified into four historical groups based on 12-versus 24-h PK studies and on the use of radioimmunoassay versus fluorescence polarization immunoassay methods for estimates of CyA concentrations. Four PK measures-trough concentration (C0), average concentration values (Cav; i.e., the dosing interval-corrected area under the concentration-time curve), maximum concentration (Cmax), and time to maximum concentration (tmax)-were examined as predictors of patient, graft, and rejection-free survival rates for each of the four groups individually and for all groups combined. Patients with an initial Cav > or = 550 ng/ml had higher 1-year (88%) and 6-year (66%) graft survival rates than patients with Cav < 550 ng/ml, who had 1- and 6-year graft survival rates of 80% and 59%, respectively (P = NS). Statistically significant differences were observed in graft survival rates between patients with Cav < 550 versus Cav > or = 550 ng/ml at 30 (88% vs 96%; P < 0.02), 60 (85% vs 94%; P < 0.007), 90 (85% vs 94%; P < 0.02), and 180 (83% vs 92%; P < 0.05) days. Moreover, patients with Cav < 550 ng/ml displayed more severe rejection episodes, as judged by Banff classification, than patients who displayed Cav > or = 550 ng/ml (grades II and III; 71% vs 50%; P = 0.036). In contrast, the C0, Cmax and tmax values did not correlate with patient, graft, or rejection-free survival rates. The pharmacokinetic parameter of Cav correlated strongly with early graft survival and may therefore, be a useful predictor of those renal transplant patients who may require more intensive post-transplant monitoring of CyA concentrations by serial PK studies to improve graft survival.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:issn0934-0874lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KahanB DBDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Van BurenC...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WelshMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SenelM FMFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:volume11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:pagination46-52lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9503554-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:year1998lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:articleTitleImpact of early cyclosporin average blood concentration on early kidney transplant failure.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical School, Houston 77030, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9503554pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed