Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9407562rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0004096lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9407562lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028128lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9407562lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0229671lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9407562lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034819lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9407562lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1749467lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9407562lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0950373lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9407562lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9407562lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521725lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:dateCreated1998-1-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:abstractTextThe hypotheses tested in this study were that during acute asthma exacerbations (1) exhaled nitric oxide concentrations [eNO] are a more sensitive, noninvasive indicator of asthma disease activity than serum markers of inflammation such as eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) or soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL2R), and (2) elevated [eNO] are reduced after treatment with glucocorticoids (GC). Peak eNO levels were measured by chemiluminescence during slow expiration. Seven asthmatic subjects (mean age 11 yrs; mean morning FEV1 65% predicted) receiving inhaled GC, and with no radiographic evidence of acute sinusitis, were studied before and after a course of oral GC. Measurements of [eNO], ECP and sIL2R levels, and FEV1% were obtained before and after a course of GC. Six atopic nonasthmatic subjects (mean age 12 years; mean FEV1 94% predicted) and seven normal subjects (mean age 13 years; mean FEV1 100% predicted) were studied. The mean peak [eNO] level (parts per billion: ppb) for the asthma subjects before treatment (52 +/- 5 ppb SEM) was greater than the value for both nonasthmatic atopic and normal subjects (16 +/- 2 ppb and 14 +/- 2 ppb SEM, respectively; P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in ECP or sIL2R values between asthmatic subjects and either atopic or normal subjects (P > 0.05). Baseline pre-GC treatment ECP levels in the asthmatic subjects were significantly higher (P < 0.002) than post-GC treatment values. The mean peak [eNO] level in the asthmatic subjects declined after oral GC treatment to 14 +/- 1 ppb (P < 0.0002) and was less than 2 ppb different from either control group (P > 0.75). We conclude that [eNO] is a more sensitive marker of asthma disease activity than ECP and sIL2R levels. In addition, [eNO] appears to be a more useful indicator of the beneficial response to GC therapy than these other measurements in pediatric asthma.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:issn8755-6863lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WhiteC WCWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeungD YDYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HarbeckRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SzeflerS JSJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NongLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McCormickD...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:volume24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:pagination305-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9407562-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:year1997lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:articleTitleComparison of exhaled nitric oxide, serum eosinophilic cationic protein, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor in exacerbations of pediatric asthma.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Pediatrics, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, CO 80206, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9407562pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9407562lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9407562lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9407562lld:pubmed