Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9401421rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036612lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9401421lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597547lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:dateCreated1998-1-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:abstractTextThree experiments concerning the processing of syntactic and semantic violations were conducted. Event-related potentials (ERPs) showed that semantic violations elicited an N400 response, whereas syntactic violations elicited two early negativities (150 and 350 ms) and a P600 response. No interaction between the semantic and early syntactic ERP effects was found. Sentence complexity and violation probability (25% vs. 75%) affected only the P600 and not the early negativities. The probability effect was taken as evidence that the P600 resembles the P3b. The temporal order of word processing in a sentence as suggested by the data was such that a more automatic syntactic analysis was performed (earlier syntactic-related negativities) in parallel with a semantic analysis (N400), after which a syntactic reanalysis was performed (P600). A reanalysis interpretation of the P600 could explain why the extent of the reanalysis differed with syntactic complexity and probability of ungrammaticality.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:issn0048-5772lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MulderGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GunterT CTClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StoweL ALAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:pagination660-76lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9401421-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:year1997lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:articleTitleWhen syntax meets semantics.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:affiliationMax-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9401421pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9401421lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9401421lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9401421lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9401421lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9401421lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:9401421lld:pubmed