Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9391187rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178602lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9391187lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040223lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9391187lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0237096lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9391187lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0851346lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9391187lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442989lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9391187lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1441506lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9391187lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037585lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9391187lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2740529lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:dateCreated1998-2-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:abstractTextWe developed a program which aims to facilitate the calculation of radiation doses to single organs and the whole body. IMEDOSE uses Excel to include calculations, graphical displays, and interactions with the user in a single general-purpose PC software tool. To start the procedure the input data are copied into a spreadsheet. They must represent percentage uptake values of several organs derived from measurements in animals or humans. To extrapolate these data up to seven half-lives of the radionuclide, fitting to one or two exponentional functions is included and can be checked by the user. By means of the approximate time-activity information the cumulated activity or residence times are calculated. Finally these data are combined with the absorbed fraction doses (S-values) given by MIRD pamphlet No. 11 to yield radiation doses, the effective dose equivalent and the effective dose. These results are presented in a final table. Interactions are realized with push-buttons and drop-down menus. Calculations use the Visual Basic tool of Excel. In order to test our program, biodistribution data of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose were taken from the literature (Meija et al., J Nucl Med 1991; 32:699-706). For a 70-kg adult the resulting radiation doses of all target organs listed in MIRD 11 were different from the ICRP 53 values by 1%+/-18% on the average. When the residence times were introduced into MIRDOSE3 (Stabin, J Nucl Med 1996; 37:538-546) the mean difference between our results and those of MIRDOSE3 was -3%+/-6%. Both outcomes indicate the validity of the present approach.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:issn0340-6997lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HerzogHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FriedrichWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Müller-Gärtne...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZilkenHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NiederbremerA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:volume24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:pagination1514-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9391187-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:year1997lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:articleTitleCalculation of residence times and radiation doses using the standard PC software Excel.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:affiliationInstitute of Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9391187pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed