Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9055459rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280551lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9055459lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009368lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9055459lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332853lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9055459lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9055459lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9055459lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:dateCreated1997-4-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:abstractTextFor end-to-end anastomosis, many techniques suitable for the small intestine end up catastrophically when applied on the colon. An experimental study involving 18 healthy adult dogs was conducted to find a model technique out of the best considered techniques for small intestinal end-to-end anastomosis viz., simple interrupted approximating sutures (group I), double-layer inverting sutures (group II), and Gambee sutures (group III). The results depicted a nonsignificant difference among groups as far as paralytic ileus and omental adhesions are concerned. Similarly, haematologic and physiologic values did not deviate from a normal pattern after any surgical intervention. Barium sulphate radiographs taken at postoperation (PO) day 14 revealed significantly lesser reduction (P < or = 0.001) in lumen diameter (26.14 +/- 1.87%) at the site of anastomosis in group I as compared to 30.16 +/- 1.20% and 38.91 +/- 1.87% reduction in groups III and II, respectively. Similarly, gain in tensile strength was maximum (26.55 +/- 1.33%) in group I and minimum (19.73 +/- 2.62%) in group II on PO day 14. The current study showed superiority of the simple interrupted suture technique for colonic end-to-end anastomosis over the other two techniques studied.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:issn0236-6290lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KhanM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChaudhryN INIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShakoorAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AtharMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:volume44lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:pagination349-56lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9055459-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:articleTitleStudies on end-to-end colonic anastomosis in the dog: a comparison of techniques.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9055459pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed