Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:9044030rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002679lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9044030lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016277lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9044030lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441655lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9044030lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003235lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9044030lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9044030lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0053089lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:dateCreated1997-5-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:abstractTextThe in-vivo antifungal activity of benanomicin A administered intravenously or subcutaneously was compared with that of amphotericin B and fluconazole using animal models of systemic infections with Candida albicans, Aspergillus fumigatus and Cryptococcus neoformans. The efficacy of benanomicin A in C. albicans infection was more pronounced when administered in multiple doses than in a single dose. This was also true of fluconazole, but not of amphotericin B, which showed no difference between single and multiple dosings. Benanomcin A eradicated C. albicans cells from the kidneys of infected mice in a manner comparable to that of amphotericin B, but more effectively than fluconazole. The histopathological findings obtained from the kidneys of the C. albicans-infected mice confirmed the therapeutic efficacy of benanomicin A. The subcutaneous ED50 values of benanomicin A were 1.30 mg/kg/day (C. albicans) and 19.0 mg/kg/day (A. fumigatus) which were intermediate between those of amphotericin B and fluconazole in the two models. The subcutaneous ED50 value of benanomicin A for C. neoformans was 21.5 mg/kg/day, which was higher than that of amphotericin B.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:issn0305-7453lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WatanabeMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YamaguchiHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TakeuchiTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorpubmed-author:UchidaKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KondoSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorpubmed-author:InouyeSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OhtsukaKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OrikasaYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:volume39lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:pagination71-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:9044030-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:year1997lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:articleTitleThe in-vivo activity of an antifungal antibiotic, benanomicin A, in comparison with amphotericin B and fluconazole.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:affiliationPharmaceutical Research Center, Meiji Seika Kaisha, Ltd, Yokohama, Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:9044030pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed