Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8985771rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019994lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8985771lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0521346lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8985771lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0204727lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8985771lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205409lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8985771lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522577lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8985771lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8985771lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1547703lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:dateCreated1997-3-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:abstractTextAs a follow-up to a 1992 study or respiratory isolation, we studied compliance with recommendations for respiratory isolation through smokestick testing (1993) and surveys (1994). Effective negative pressure was demonstrated in 80 of 156 rooms and was associated with the presence of anterooms (P < .001). The proportion of surveyed hospitals periodically testing isolation rooms increased from 0% (1992) to 30% (1993) to 100% (1994; P < .001).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:issn0899-823Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JonesMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FoghSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FraserV JVJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:authorpubmed-author:L'EcuyerP BPBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:volume17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:pagination816-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8985771-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:articleTitleFollow-up evaluation of respiratory isolation rooms in 10 midwestern hospitals.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:affiliationDivision of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110-1093, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8985771pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed