Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8967599rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0199470lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967599lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013682lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967599lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967599lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967599lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706909lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967599lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443252lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:issue9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:dateCreated1996-12-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:abstractTextTwo commercially available bacterial filters to be used as part of the mechanical ventilation unit during anaesthesia were tested for hygienic criteria. Manufacturers claim that bacterial breathing filters have a filtration capacity of about 99.995%, so that there would be no need for thermal disinfection of tubing and ventilation circuits after each use. One filter is designed for a single use only, the other can be used up to 24 times after sterilisation. Both filters consist of hydrophobic glass fibres.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:issn0003-2417lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchmuckerPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TichySSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NielsenH JHJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MeckePPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:volume45lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:pagination814-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967599-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967599-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967599-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967599-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967599-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967599-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:articleTitle[Comparative study of the efficiency of bacterial filters in long-term mechanical ventilation].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:affiliationKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Medizinische Universität zu Lübeck.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967599pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8967599lld:pubmed