Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8967004rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332437lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967004lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205042lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967004lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0333186lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967004lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043309lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:dateCreated1996-12-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:abstractTextThe data on 36 patients who had undergone coronary angiography (CAG) and/or transluminal balloon angioplasty (TBAP) again after successful TBAP were analyzed. Twenty four patients were found to develop restenosis (n = 26), 80 and 92% of patients having them within the first 6 and 12 months after successful TBAP, respectively. Restenosis were demonstrated to be of almost the same degree and extent as the baseline stenoses; however, after repeated TBAP there was a slight reduction in the extent of residual stenosis as compared with the first TBAP (15.9 +/- 16.1% and 30.8 +/- 16.6%, respectively), though this difference was insignificant. At baseline, 42% of dilated stenoses were complicated and/or eccentric, while restenosis were eccentric in 16% of cases (p < 0.05) and complicated in 21% (p < 0.05). Thus, restenoses are X-ray morphologically more favourable for TBAP.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:languageruslld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:issn0042-4676lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SavchenkoA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PavlovN ANAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Murashkovski...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Levitski?I...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:pagination13-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967004-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967004-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967004-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967004-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967004-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8967004-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:articleTitle[X-ray morphology of coronary artery restenosis].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8967004pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed