Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8839336rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035820lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0029468lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205103lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0447303lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0185624lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0591895lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1947917lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0991560lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706425lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:dateCreated1996-12-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:abstractTextThe aim of this study was to compare two types of osteotomy wafers, derived from model surgery on a semi-adjustable anatomical articulator. The thick wafer was fabricated before autorotation of the mandibular cast and the thin after the autorotation. Twenty-five patients, 19 female and 6 male, who had osteotomies with a maxillary impaction as part of a bimaxillary correction were included in this study. Thick and thin wafers were fabricated and the surgeons were requested to compare both wafers, intra-operatively. Valid results were received for 19 cases, in 14 (74%) the surgeons concluded that both wafers located the maxilla in the same position. In 5 cases (26%) there was up to 2 mm difference in the maxillary position. These were cases when the impaction was > 6 mm, however, chi 2 and Fisher's exact test showed that the difference in impaction between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.06).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:issn1010-5182lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HarrisMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BamberM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:volume23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:pagination396-400lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8839336-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:articleTitleThe role of the occlusal wafer in orthognathic surgery; a comparison of thick and thin intermediate osteotomy wafers.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:affiliationJoint Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Eastman Dental and University College London Hospitals, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8839336pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8839336lld:pubmed