Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8832001rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003308lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442162lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1831743lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1328050lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1550718lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514923lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:dateCreated1997-2-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:abstractTextSystemic fungal infections (SFI) in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) are a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality. Preclinical studies have reported augmented antifungal activity of monocytes, macrophage cells, and neutrophils exposed to certain colony-stimulating factors (CSF), including GM-CSF. We conducted a retrospective descriptive epidemiologic study to examine the characteristics of 145 consecutive patients receiving HDC administered with or without autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and who subsequently received either GM-CSF and G-CSF, G-CSF alone, GM-CSF +/- IL-3 or no CSF. The analysis of this patient population sought to define the incidence of SFI and its relationship to therapy with monocyte/macrophage-stimulating (MMS group) cytokines (GM-CSF and G-CSF; GM-CSF +/- IL-3) or to cytokines which do not result in monocyte/macrophage stimulation (NMMS group, G-CSF alone or no CSF). Risk factors for the development of SFI were balanced between the MMS (n = 70) and NMMS (n = 75) groups. Two patients (2.9%) in the MMS and nine patients (12%) in the NMMS groups developed SFI. The risk ratio for developing SFI in the NMMS group compared to the MMS group was 4.20 (P = 0.023). This relationship was confounded, however, by the diagnosis of hematologic tumor or solid tumor (RR = 3.15, P = 0.082). SFI was the primary cause or major contributing factor in five of the 10 total deaths in our study population. Four SFI-related deaths occurred in the NMMS group and one SFI-related death occurred in the MMS group. Our data suggest a protective role for GM-CSF, IL-3 or other MMS cytokines in preventing SFI in patients receiving HDC. This should be further investigated as a potential complementary approach to conventional strategies in antifungal prophylaxis for patients receiving HDC.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:issn0268-3369lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SpitzerGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NiemeyerRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HarrisonB RBRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McIntyreWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DunphyF RFRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VelasquezW...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PetruskaP JPJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VrahnosDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AdkinsD RDRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BowersC ECElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PetersB GBGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AuberryS ESElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:volume18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:pagination93-102lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8832001-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:articleTitleAntifungal effects of yeast-derived rhu-GM-CSF in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy given with or without autologous stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Pharmacy, Saint Louis University Hospital, MO 63110-0250, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:publicationTypeReviewlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8832001pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8832001lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8832001lld:pubmed