Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8818786rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0302592lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8818786lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0677043lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8818786lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332305lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8818786lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205148lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8818786lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8818786lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8818786lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707520lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8818786lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705946lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:dateCreated1996-12-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:abstractTextThe authors evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with body coil and endorectal surface coil techniques in the staging of cervical carcinomas and compare these results with those obtained with clinical staging (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics [FIGO] classification) and postsurgical histopathology.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:issn0020-9996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EbnerFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TamussinoKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RannerGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PreidlerK WKWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SzolarD MDMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:volume31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:pagination458-62lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8818786-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8818786-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8818786-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8818786-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8818786-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8818786-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8818786-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8818786-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:articleTitleStaging of cervical carcinomas. Comparison of body-coil magnetic resonance imaging and endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging with histopathologic correlation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Radiology, Karl Franzens University, Graz, Austria.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8818786pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed