Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8793779rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332437lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034493lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026336lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0559189lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024090lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0577559lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332466lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522240lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:dateCreated1996-12-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:abstractTextWe used computed tomography and the rabbit model to seek an explanation for the biomechanical superiority of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) as compared with autogenous iliac bone in lumbar intertransverse process fusions, i.e., the rhBMP-2 fusions demonstrated significantly higher strength and stiffness. The results show that the fusion masses using rhBMP-2 have higher volume, and higher minimum contact area of fusion mass attachment to the transverse process. For both bone graft materials there was a correlation between site of failure and the fusion mass quadrant that contained the minimum contact area of attachment to the transverse process. The ideal graft material would be one that produced strong, mature, early fusions that failed along their length at random positions, rather than failing with high frequency at the transverse process. The fusions using rhBMP-2 were nearer to the ideal than those using autograft: These were stronger, more mature, and only 6 of 9 rhBMP-2 failed in the quadrant that contained the minimum contact area of attachment to the transverse process, as opposed to 11 of 12 for autograft.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:issn0895-0385lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HuttonW CWClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BodenS DSDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HolligerE HEHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TrawickR HRHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:pagination125-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:dateRevised2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8793779-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:articleTitleMorphology of the lumbar intertransverse process fusion mass in the rabbit model: a comparison between two bone graft materials--rhBMP-2 and autograft.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:affiliationEmory Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Decatur, Georgia 30033, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8793779pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8793779lld:pubmed