| pubmed-article:8778098 | pubmed:abstractText | An experiment was conducted to evaluate ammoniation and temper processing of two barley varieties of diverse types on feedlot cattle performance and diet digestibility. Steptoe (feed variety) and Klages (malting variety) barleys were processed as dry-rolled (DR); tempered and rolled (TR); tempered, ammoniated, and rolled (AR); and tempered, ammoniated, and fed whole (AW). Crossbred steers (n = 240, initial weight 266 kg) were blocked by weight and randomly assigned to one of eight treatments in a 2 x 4 factorial arrangement. Diets contained 30% barley (DM basis) for the growing phase and 85% (DM basis) for the finishing phase. Growing phase ADG and gain to feed (G/F) were less (P < .05) for AW than for DR, TR, and AR. Average daily gain was less (P < .05) for AW than for TR and AR in the finishing phase. There were no differences (P > .05) in ADG or G/F between DR, TR, and AR during growing or finishing phases. Gain to feed was greater (P < .05) for TR and AR than for AW but not for DR for the total trial. Hot carcass weight, longissimus muscle area, and kidney-pelvic-heart fat were greater (P < .05) for TR and AR than for AW. Total finishing diet ADF digestibility was greater (P < .05) for Steptoe than for Klages (40.5 vs 31.4%, respectively). The DR treatment had the lowest ADF digestibility, whereas AR had the greatest (P < .05). Results suggest that there were no differences in feedlot steer performance due to barley varieties of the same bulk density and that barley grain must be mechanically processed for optimal performance response rather than ammoniated and fed as whole grain. | lld:pubmed |
