Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8771438rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162429lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771438lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1457887lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771438lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036341lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771438lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0011155lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771438lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439064lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771438lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021149lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771438lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2745888lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771438lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871935lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:dateCreated1996-11-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:abstractTextForty schizophrenic, 20 affective-disordered, and 40 matched normal control subjects were compared on postulated marker and symptom measures of schizophrenic deficits in: (a) affect; (b) attention; (c) proprioception; and (d) thought. The schizophrenic group was significantly more impaired on all four vulnerability markers than were the other two groups, while the schizophrenic and affective-psychotic groups showed comparable impairments on three of the psychotic symptom deficits. The incidence of multiple marker deficits was significantly greater in the schizophrenic than in the affective group. The hypothesis of independence of marker deficits was supported by the absence of any significant correlations among markers in the schizophrenic sample. The data support the theory that independent markers of schizophrenic vulnerability may potentiate schizophrenic disorders when their incidence is concurrent and at deficit levels.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:issn0021-9762lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RosenbaumGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FieldsR BRBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WightmanL HLHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChapinK JKJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:volume52lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:pagination109-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771438-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:articleTitleMultiple deficit theory of schizophrenia: incidence of markers vs. symptoms.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:affiliationUniversity of Detroit, Mercy, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771438pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed