Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8771138rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016658lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771138lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023175lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771138lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205237lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:issue12 Pt 1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:dateCreated1996-9-26lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:abstractTextRoutine follow-up chest X ray of several patients with the Endotak transvenous pacing lead suggested fracture of the conductor at the distal end of the proximal defibrillating coil. Electrical evaluation of these patients' leads demonstrated them to be working normally. Multiple x-ray views of a new undamaged lead demonstrated that in some projection the Endotak lead may appear fractured in spite of normal continuity of the conductors. Physicians dealing with these patients should be aware of this confusing x-ray finding.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:issn0147-8389lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KrausJ EJElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LemanR MRMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchabelSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:volume18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:pagination2225-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8771138-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:articleTitlePseudo fracture of a defibrillating lead.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery-Division of CT Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8771138pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed