Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8769957rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035820lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8769957lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027950lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8769957lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0156181lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8769957lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522492lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:dateCreated1996-12-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:abstractTextThe most common cause of intraperitoneal adhesions is previous abdominal surgery. Postoperative adhesion formation results from a fibroproliferative inflammatory reaction that begins with an influx of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) into the peritoneal cavity. Adherence of the PMNs to the endothelial cells (EC) is necessary for PMN migration into the tissue in response to a stimulus. Several receptor-counterreceptor pairs of ligands such as CD11/CD18 on the PMN and ICAM-1 (CD54) on EC have been identified. Monoclonal antibody against CD11/CD18 (R15.7) inhibits PMN adherence and migration and consequently protects against PMN-induced tissue injuries. We therefore studied the effect of preventing PMN-EC adherence, using anti-CD18 monoclonal antibody, on postoperative adhesion formation in rabbits. Group 1 was a control receiving physiologic saline, and group 2 received anti-CD18 antibody (R15.7, 2 mg/kg). The treatment was administered iv at the end of surgery and repeated on the first and second postoperative days. Peritoneal adhesions were induced at laparotomy by repairing two peritoneal defects, by oversewing the defect (model 1), and by resuturing the removed parietal peritoneum in its place as an ischemic graft (model 2). Adhesions were evaluated blindly at 10 days after operation by measuring the percentage of the suture line covered with adhesions (model 1) or by a scoring system (model 2). All control animals developed intraperitoneal adhesions and the percentage of the suture line covered with adhesions was 25 +/- 5.9% (mean +/- SEM) and the mean score in model 2 was 0.9 +/- 0.2. Anti-CD18 antibody, R15.7, increased the degree of postoperative adhesion formation in both models, but the results were significant only in model 2. Also, anti-CD18 antibody significantly decreased peritoneal neutrophils from 11.1 x 10(7) +/- 1.8 x 10(7) to 2.2 x 10(7) +/- 0.4 x 10(7) (P < 0.001) on the first postoperative day. It is concluded that inhibition of PMN-EC adherence does influence the postoperative adhesion formation. These results might suggest that PMNs have a role in modulating postoperative adhesion formation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:issn0022-4804lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HarrisR BRBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Ar'RajabAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DawidsonI JIJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MileskiWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SentementesJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SikesPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:volume61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:pagination143-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:dateRevised2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8769957-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:articleTitleThe role of neutrophils in peritoneal adhesion formation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas 75235-9031, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8769957pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8769957lld:pubmed