Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8746910rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033095lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8746910lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0080310lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8746910lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0678594lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8746910lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8746910lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205191lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8746910lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:dateCreated1996-9-26lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:abstractTextTo evaluate gender-related differences in left ventricular (LV) structure and function in aortic stenosis, LV biplane cineangiography, micromanometry and endomyocardial biopsies were carried out in 56 patients with aortic stenosis and normal coronary arteries. Patients were divided into males (M: n = 35), and females (F: n = 21). Sixteen normal subjects 8 M, 8 F) served as haemodynamic controls. Control biopsy data were obtained from six pre-transplantation donor hearts (3 M and 3 F). LV systolic function was evaluated by ejection fraction and its relationship to mean systolic circumferential wall stress, diastolic function by the time constant of LV pressure decay, peak filling rates and passive myocardial stiffness constant. Biopsy samples were evaluated for interstitial fibrosis, muscle fibre diameter and volume fraction of myofibrils. In a subset of 27 consecutive patients, biopsy samples were evaluated with a morphometric-morphological method, for total collagen volume fraction, endocardial fibrosis and the extension and thickness of orthogonal collagen fibres (cross-hatching). In patients with aortic stenosis, aortic valve area, aortic valve resistance and mean aortic pressure gradient were comparable in males and females, whereas end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes were larger in males than females. Ejection fraction was lower (56%) in males than females (64%) (P < 0.05); 20 of 35 males and four of 21 females had depressed systolic contractility when assessed with regard to the relationship ejection fraction-mean systolic stress (P < 0.01). Myocardial stiffness constant was higher in males than in females (P < 0.01). Nine of 14 males and two of 13 females had endocardial fibrosis (P < 0.009), whereas increased cross-hatching (> 1.5 grade) was present in 11 males and four females with aortic stenosis (P < 0.01). An abnormal collagen architecture was present in 13/14 males and 5/13 females (P < 0.002). In aortic stenosis, males have a depressed systolic function and abnormal passive elastic properties when compared to females with valve lesions of similar severity. Changes in collagen architecture may account, at least in part, for these differences.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:issn0195-668Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchneiderJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VillardGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HessO MOMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChiarielloMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CampbellS ESElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VassalloMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:volume16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:pagination1410-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8746910-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:articleTitleSex-dependent differences in left ventricular function and structure in chronic pressure overload.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8746910pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8746910lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8746910lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8746910lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8746910lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8746910lld:pubmed