Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8737594rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1880904lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0229671lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034580lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1272706lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1561577lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514811lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706462lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:issue1-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:dateCreated1996-11-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:abstractTextThe serum neuron specific enolase (S-NSE; EC 4.2.1.11) reference interval was evaluated by DELFIA (Wallac) in 161 healthy blood donors and the method compared with the S-NSE RIA assay (Pharmacia). The DELFIA assay total analytical variation coefficient (CV%) was between 3.7% and 6.6%., the RIA CV% 7.6% to 13.1%. Late centrifugation (after hours) increased the variation as a result of contamination with blood cells. Log transformation into a gaussian distribution was selected by Box-Cox analysis and tested by two models: the gauss-distribution and the Refval transformation. The 95% reference intervals and corresponding 90% confidence intervals were: female 2.9-9.6 micrograms/l (2.6-3.2 and 8.5-10.7) micrograms/l and male 3.4-11.7 micrograms/l (3.0-3.8 and 10.2-13.2 micrograms/l). Mean values were significantly different (P < 0.001), female 5.3 (4.9-5.6), male 6.3 (5.8-6.7) micrograms/l. The serum NSE levels were analysed with both methods in a population of 110 patients. The results were significantly correlated (coefficient, 0.9896; r, 0.99; P < 0.0001-two tailed). For high S-NSE values (> 150.0 micrograms/l) differences between the methods exceeded the mean difference + 2S.D., while low concentrations were interconvertible. Maximal diagnostic efficacy was 0.91 for both assays, in DELFIA 17.2-23.9 micrograms/l and for RIA 17.2-21.9 micrograms/l. Identical sensitivity, specificity, discriminative power score, and likelihood ratio were found. The two methods are consequently interconvertible.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:issn0009-8981lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MomsenGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HirschF RFRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JørgensenL...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CarlsenN LNLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LøberJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:day30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:volume249lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:pagination77-91lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8737594-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:articleTitleSerum neuron specific enolase (S-NSE) reference interval evaluation by time-resolved immunofluorometry compared with a radioimmunoassay.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8737594pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed