Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8734741rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036974lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8734741lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021107lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8734741lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8734741lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8734741lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0870733lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8734741lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0348084lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8734741lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162589lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:dateCreated1996-10-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of the current study was to characterize the effects of transvenous ICD shocks on myocardial impedance. Rather than recording impedance during shocks, it was measured during continuous pacing in order to minimize confounding effects such as electrode polarization. Pacing impedance (reflecting the combined impedances of the electrode-tissue interface, myocardium, and blood pool) was measured every 5 seconds before and after 58 single shocks in 22 patients undergoing ICD implantation with a Transvene (n = 14) or Endotak (n = 8) lead. There was a progressive and long-lasting decrease in impedance after shocks. The magnitude of this change was similar for 0.6-J test shocks and shocks > or = 5 J (28 +/- 32 omega vs 23 +/- 16 omega; P = 0.8). However, the drop in impedance was more abrupt after high energy shocks. Because impedance continued to decline throughout the 5-minute interval between shocks, successive shocks had a cumulative effect, with a decrease of 46 +/- 42 omega after four discharges. In conclusion, a progressive decline in pacing impedance is a characteristic response to transvenous ICD discharges.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:issn0147-8389lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WalterP FPFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LangbergJ JJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HartungW MWMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Hidden-LucetF...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McTeagueK KKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:volume19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:pagination752-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8734741-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:articleTitleEffects of high energy shocks on pacing impedance during transvenous ICD implantation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:affiliationCardiology Division, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8734741pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed