Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8676294rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006145lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676294lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009393lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676294lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0554756lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676294lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032863lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676294lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676294lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:dateCreated1996-8-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:abstractTextIn order to evaluate the interest of power doppler in breast studies, we studied 27 breast lesions in 22 patients. This series includes 8 malignant lesions, 11 benign lesions, and 8 enlarged lymph nodes. We used a Esaote Biomedica ultrasound machine with a 7 MHz transducer. We compared power doppler and pulsed doppler for every lesion. Power doppler was more sensitive in 3 out of 8 malignant tumors, 8 out of 11 benign lesions, and 5 out of 8 lymph nodes involvement. This study shows the value of power doppler in breast studies. The increased sensitivity, however, is balanced by a decreased specificity.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:languagefrelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:issn0221-0363lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrunetonJ NJNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LorenzettiJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarcyP YPYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaestriEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HuysCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:volume76lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:pagination1075-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676294-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676294-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676294-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676294-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676294-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676294-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:articleTitle[Comparative study of power Doppler and color Doppler in breast diseases].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:affiliationCentre Antoine-Lacassagne, Service d'Imagerie Médicale, Nice.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676294pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed