Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8676039rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0223724lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676039lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522662lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676039lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0728733lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676039lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0808080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676039lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443254lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676039lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0185023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676039lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705922lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:dateCreated1996-8-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:abstractTextWe have investigated five devices suitable for scaphoid fixation (ASIF 2.7 mm and 3.5 mm cannulated screws, Herbert, Herbert-Whipple, and Howmedica Universal Compression Screw). The biomechanical properties tested were compression and resistance to cantilever bending. There was no statistically significant difference in compression between devices. There were significant differences in resistance to cantilever bending, with the Howmedica screw being strongest in both failure mode and in ultimate failure strength.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:issn0266-7681lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WilliamsC DCDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NewportM LMLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BradleyW DWDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:volume21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:pagination99-102lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:dateRevised2009-6-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676039-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676039-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676039-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676039-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676039-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8676039-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:articleTitleMechanical strength of scaphoid fixation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8676039pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed