pubmed-article:8637205 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8637205 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0012634 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8637205 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0007097 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8637205 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0042425 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8637205 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0374743 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8637205 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0443268 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1996-7-5 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:abstractText | This study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of radical lymphadenectomy in ampullary cancer with nodal disease. Thirty-five patients underwent the Whipple procedure with radical lymphadenectomy. The location and number of positive nodes was characterized. Eighteen patients (51%) had positive nodes. Patients without nodal disease (pN0 group) had an actuarial 5-year survival rate of 81%. Seven patients with metastasis confined to the pancreaticoduodenal nodes had a 5-year survival rate of 67%, which was comparable for the pN0 group (N.S.) and better than the 27% 5-year survival rate in patients with positive superior mesenteric nodes (P<0.05). Eleven patients with one to three positive nodes had a 5-year survival rate of 71%, which was also comparable to the pN0 group (N.S.) and better than the 0% 5-year survival rate in patients with four or more positive nodes (P<0.01). Radical lymphadenectomy is effective against a limited degree of nodal disease. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:month | Mar | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:issn | 0022-4790 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TsukadaKK | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:OhtaniTT | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HatakeyamaKK | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ShiraiYY | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:volume | 61 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:pagination | 190-4 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8637205-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:year | 1996 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:articleTitle | Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: is radical lymphadenectomy beneficial to patients with nodal disease? | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Surgery, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata City, Japan. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:8637205 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8637205 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8637205 | lld:pubmed |