Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8627977rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8627977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1956346lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8627977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205476lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8627977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0010055lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8627977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8627977lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443252lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:dateCreated1996-6-27lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:abstractTextThe long-term results of medical therapy and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were compared in patients with multivessel disease. All patients were confirmed to have > or = 75% luminal narrowing of major coronary arteries by coronary arteriogram. When multivessel disease was stratified into double- and triple- vessel disease, the outcomes varied. In triple-vessel disease, the outcome with CABG was good, but the outcome was unfavorable in those employing medical therapy, particularly in patients with decreased left ventricular (LV) function. In patients with double-vessel disease with good LV function, the long-term results with medical therapy were just as favorable as those with CABG. However, double-vessel disease complicated by reduced LV function (ejection faction < or = 40%) had a clearly less favorable outcome when treated with medical therapy than with CABG. Thus, it is important for patients with multivessel disease to undergo revascularization if indicated, to improve their prognosis. On the other hand, the incidence of cardiac events arising from vein graft occlusions tended to increase in CABG patients after 5 years or more following surgery.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:issn0021-4868lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NakanishiSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KobayashiTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NishiyamaSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MakuuchiHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RANDE OEOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NaruseYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IwaseTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IshiwataSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KomiyamaNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YanagishitaYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:volume36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:pagination709-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8627977-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:articleTitleComparison of long-term efficacy of medical treatment versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in multivessel coronary artery disease.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:affiliationCardiovascular Center, Division of Cardiology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8627977pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed