Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8623194rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220825lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8623194lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0855279lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8623194lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0806140lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8623194lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1096776lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8623194lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1548161lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:dateCreated1996-6-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:abstractTextThe flow cytometric crossmatch is a technique that is increasingly being used by clinical transplant laboratories. In this multicenter study by the British Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics Flow Cytometry Group, a series of crossmatches were carried out to determine whether different centers obtained same results when performing the same crossmatch. There was greater than 80% agreement among participating laboratories on the results of 35/54 tests. There was no clear agreement in the remaining 20 cases. Quantitative analysis, estimating the number of cell-bound fluorescein molecules, demonstrated that differences in the criteria used by each center to define a positive crossmatch were responsible for some discordant results. When applied, definition of positivity based on the molecules of fluorescein increased concordance from 57.5% to 81.4%.l. These results suggest that a criterion for the interpretation of results based on quantitative analysis of bound antibody may be more reliable than methods in current routine use.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:issn0041-1337lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EvansP RPRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HorsburghTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MartinSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShentonB KBKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McCloskeyDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BellA EAElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ReynoldsW MWMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RobsonAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SuttonMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CulkinJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HarmerA WAWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CavanaghGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GarnerSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AnyanwuCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Van DamM GMGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:volume61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:pagination1108-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8623194-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8623194-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8623194-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:year1996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:articleTitleEvaluation of the flow cytometric crossmatch. Preliminary results of a multicenter study.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:affiliationSouth Thames Tissue Typing, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8623194pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed