Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8578831rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030657lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042960lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1549078lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036953lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026336lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1997894lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005367lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0596545lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0805586lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006353lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205349lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521801lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:issue16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:dateCreated1996-3-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:abstractTextIn the absence of a definitive immunologic correlate of protection against shigellosis, promising Shigella vaccine candidates have been selected based on their ability to confer resistance against experimental challenge with wild-type Shigella in healthy adult volunteers. A limitation of this model has been the low and often variable attack rate of illness among controls, necessitating repeated inpatient studies to demonstrate statistically significant results. In this study, the Shigella challenge model was modified by using bicarbonate buffer instead of skimmed milk as the delivery vehicle to enhance survival of the ingested challenge inoculum. To determine the ability of the modified model to detect protective efficacy, 11 veteran volunteers (previously challenged with S. flexneri 2a in bicarbonate buffer) and 12 immunologically naive control subjects were challenged with 1.4 x 10(3) c.f.u. S. flexneri 2a. Shigellosis occurred in 3 veterans and 11 control subjects (27 vs 92%, p = 0.003), yielding a protective efficacy of 70%. Dose response was evaluated in an additional seven naive subjects who were inoculated with a log lower (1.4 x 10(2) c.f.u.) S. flexneri 2a and had a significantly diminished attack rate of shigellosis (317 (43%) vs 11/12 (92%), p = 0.04). These findings indicate that the modified bicarbonate challenge model using an inoculum of 10(3) c.f.u. is a safe, repeatable, and valid method of selecting Shigella vaccines and other immunoprophylactic agents that are likely to confer protection against natural shigellosis.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:issn0264-410Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LevineM MMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SadoffJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HallT WTWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TaylorD NDNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WassermanS...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LosonskyG AGAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NataroJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KotloffK LKLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:volume13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:pagination1488-94lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8578831-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:articleTitleA modified Shigella volunteer challenge model in which the inoculum is administered with bicarbonate buffer: clinical experience and implications for Shigella infectivity.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8578831pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8578831lld:pubmed