Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8551996rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205476lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8551996lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0043303lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8551996lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034533lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8551996lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514873lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:issue10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:dateCreated1996-2-22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:abstractTextPrevious darkroom shielding requirements for medical x-ray film-assumed that the film should not be exposed to diagnostic x-ray radiation levels greater than 2 microGy (0.2 mR) for the life of the film. Modern medical x-ray films are much less sensitive to ionizing radiation, with most films showing at least an order of magnitude less sensitivity than previously assumed. Conversely, these same films when loaded in cassettes using modern intensifying screens exhibit an order of magnitude greater sensitivity when these cassettes are exposed to ionizing radiation. These data suggest that protection of modern medical x-ray film, stored in a darkroom, may require less shielding than previously assumed. Conversely, film loaded in a cassette will require greater shielding.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:issn0094-2405lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GrayJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RueterF GFGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FewellT RTRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ConwayB JBJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SuleimanO HOHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SlaytonR JRJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:pagination1691-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8551996-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8551996-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8551996-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8551996-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8551996-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:year1995lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:articleTitleRadiation protection requirements for medical x-ray film.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:affiliationFood and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health (HFZ-240), Rockville, Maryland 20857, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8551996pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed