Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8527701rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8527701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037173lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8527701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8527701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013295lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8527701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034665lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8527701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2587213lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8527701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8527701lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0378091lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:dateCreated1996-1-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:abstractTextRoxatidine acetate, a new H2 receptor antagonist, was compared with ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers in a double-blind multicentre study. Eighty-four patients with endoscopically proven duodenal ulcer were randomized to receive 150 mg roxatidine acetate or 300 mg ranitidine at bedtime. Repeat endoscopy was performed after 4 weeks (25-33 days) and if the ulcer had not healed, another endoscopy was performed after a further 4 weeks of treatment. Using per protocol analysis 73.6% of ulcers treated with roxatidine healed at 4 weeks compared to 72.2% of ulcers treated with ranitidine (P = NS). The healing rates at 8 weeks were 92% with roxatidine and 83.3% with ranitidine (P = NS). Using equivalence tests, the healing rate of roxatidine was found to be equivalent to that of ranitidine within a 20% region. Roxatidine users took significantly less antacids than ranitidine users (P < 0.05). There were no significant adverse effects due to roxatidine or ranitidine. Roxatidine is a safe effective drug in the treatment of duodenal ulcers with a healing rate comparable to that of ranitidine.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:issn0815-9319lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LiuC KCKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KaneJ WJWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GELLP GPGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HoT KTKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NgH SHSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GweeK AKAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:volume10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:pagination379-82lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8527701-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:articleTitleRoxatidine versus ranitidine in the treatment of duodenal ulcers: a randomized double-blind controlled multicentre study in Singapore.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Toa Payoh Hospital, Singapore.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8527701pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed