| pubmed-article:8527534 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0087111 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0008976 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0036472 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0039644 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0013090 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0034656 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0439858 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1996-2-1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:abstractText | To assess the clinical efficacy of short-course doxycycline in the treatment of scrub typhus, we compared conventional 7-day tetracycline therapy with 3-day doxycycline therapy in 116 patients. Patients were randomized to receive either tetracycline (500 mg four times daily; n = 50) or doxycycline (100 mg twice daily; n = 66) and were followed for 4 weeks after the completion of treatment. The cure rate was 100% in the tetracycline group and 93.9% in the doxycycline group (P > .05). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of the interval required for defervescence or for the alleviation of symptoms. There were no relapses in either group. These data suggest that 3-day doxycycline therapy is as effective as conventional 7-day tetracycline therapy for the cure of scrub typhus and the prevention of relapses. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:month | Sep | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:issn | 1058-4838 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KimY SYS | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LeeCC | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ChoS RSR | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PaiC HCH | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ChangW HWH | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RyuJJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SongJ HJH | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ChoiS WSW | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ChoiJ EJE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:volume | 21 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:pagination | 506-10 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8527534-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:year | 1995 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:articleTitle | Short-course doxycycline treatment versus conventional tetracycline therapy for scrub typhus: a multicenter randomized trial. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:affiliation | Division of Infectious Diseases, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Korea. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:publicationType | Randomized Controlled Trial | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8527534 | pubmed:publicationType | Multicenter Study | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:8527534 | lld:pubmed |
