Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8500420rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1257890lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8500420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1556085lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8500420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014507lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8500420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0543467lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8500420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0699791lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8500420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8500420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282411lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8500420lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:issue20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:dateCreated1993-6-30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:abstractTextIn a prospective multi-centre study data were collected on 1,999 patients (1273 men, 726 women; mean age 62.3 [19-99] years) with gastric carcinoma, admitted to one of 19 surgical departments in Germany between 1.4. 1986 to 30. 6. 1989. Previously treated patients as well as those with synchronous or metachronous tumours and carcinoma of the gastric stump had been excluded. The resection rate for gastric carcinoma was 82.7%, i.e. resection was no longer possible because of the advanced tumour stage in nearly 20%. The tumour was located in the upper third of the stomach in 30%, the antrum in 26.3%. An intestinal type of growth was present in 51.9%. An early carcinoma was diagnosed in 16.9% of operated patients; it had already metastasized to regional lymph nodes in 16.5%. Nearly 70% of patients with resectable tumours had metastases to the regional lymph-nodes, with distant metastases in 30%. An advanced tumour stage (UICC stage IIIB or IV) was present in 43%. Exclusively surgical treatment is not effective in these cases.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:issn0012-0472lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:EGANJ PJPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HermanekPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SiewertJ RJRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BuschRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MeyerH JHJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BöttcherKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RoderJ DJDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:day21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:volume118lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:pagination729-36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8500420-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:articleTitle[The epidemiology of stomach carcinoma from the surgical viewpoint. The results of the German Stomach Carcinoma Study 1992. The German Stomach Carcinoma Study Group].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:affiliationChirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8500420pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed