Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8499148rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027819lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005961lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392360lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514474lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2349209lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1549649lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205099lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205171lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:dateCreated1993-6-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:abstractText76 patients with high risk neuroblastoma were treated with one (41 patients) or two consecutive courses (35 patients) of megatherapy. Autologous bone marrow transplantation was scheduled after each megatherapy. Univariate analysis confirmed two prognostic factors in this heterogeneous study population: no bone lesions before megatherapy and age at diagnosis of less than 2 years with 5-year progression-free survival rates of 51% (P < 0.0007) and 53% (P < 0.025), respectively. Both factors were shown to be of independent prognostic significance using the Cox proportional hazard model. Identification of prognostic factors should help to define the interest and limits of megatherapy. We consider that elective megatherapy followed by innovative treatments appears justified in patients with persisting bone disease. In contrast, megatherapy has to be re-evaluated for patients showing a more favourable response pattern and/or young age, ideally in a randomised, prospective trial.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:issn0959-8049lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BironPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Brunat-Mentig...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PhilipTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PhilipIIlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LadensteinRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LasserEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BouffetEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CombaretVVlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FavrotMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChauvinFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:volume29Alld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:pagination947-56lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8499148-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:articleTitleIndication and limits of megatherapy and bone marrow transplantation in high-risk neuroblastoma: a single centre analysis of prognostic factors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:affiliationBone Marrow Transplantation Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8499148pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed