Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8496936rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035647lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496936lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521970lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496936lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005456lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496936lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220781lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496936lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1167622lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496936lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1883254lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496936lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040399lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496936lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1512628lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:dateCreated1993-6-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:abstractText2-, 3-, and 4-idophenyl derivatives of the high-affinity sigma ligand N-[2-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (1) were synthesized in two to four steps starting from N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine. These compounds were evaluated for their capacity to label both sigma 1 and sigma 2 subtypes in vitro. sigma-1 binding affinity was determined by measuring competition with [3H]-(+)-pentazocine binding to guinea pig brain membranes while sigma 2 binding was evaluated through competition with [3H]DTG binding to rat liver membranes in the presence of excess dextrallorphan. The binding data revealed that N-[2-(3-iodophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (2) and N-[2-(4-iodophenyl)ethyl]-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (3) displayed almost identical binding affinity at sigma 1 sites to the parent compound 1. This suggests that the 3- or 4-iodo group can effectively substitute for the 3,4-dichloro substituents of 1. In this series of compounds, Ki's at the sigma 1 site varied from 2.0 nM for N-(4-iodobenzyl)-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (6) to 26.6 nM for N-(2-iodobenzyl)-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (4). Ki's for sigma 2 site ranged from 8.1 nM for 1 to 220 nM for N-(3-bromobenzyl)-N-methyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamine (11) while the sigma 2/sigma 1 ratio varied from 1.8 for 4 to 25 for 11. Comparing halogen substitution, the trend Cl = I > Br > F was observed for binding affinity at sigma 1 sites; no such trend was observed at sigma 2 sites. On the basis of the binding data, compounds 2 and 3 were selected for labeling with 123I. Thus, treatment of the corresponding 3- and 4-(tributylstannyl) intermediates (7 and 8) with Na123I in the presence of excess CH3CO3H furnished [123I]-2 and [123I]-3 in up to 70% radiochemical yield. Preliminary in vitro binding with [123I]-3 indicated up to 97% specific binding with guinea pig brain membranes.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:issn0022-2623lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeeK SKSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WilliamsWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BowerW HWHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeinbergerD...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:authorpubmed-author:de CostaB RBRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaX WXWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:day5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:volume36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:pagination566-71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496936-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:articleTitleSynthesis and binding characteristics of potential SPECT imaging agents for sigma-1 and sigma-2 binding sites.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:affiliationLaboratory of Medicinal Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496936pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed-article:8496936lld:chembl
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8496936lld:pubmed