Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8496038rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013798lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496038lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086741lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496038lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496038lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1979874lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496038lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0520510lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496038lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1554881lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:dateCreated1993-6-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:abstractTextIn a previous study, intrauterine injection of meglumine-sodium diatrizoate (high osmolar contrast media) during hysterosalpingography was found to induce lengthening of the QTc interval on electrocardiography. To evaluate the relationship between high osmolality and electrocardiographic changes during intrauterine injection, the authors evaluated the effect on QTc of two ionic contrast agents with different osmolality during routine hysterosalpingography.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:issn0020-9996lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarmorAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ProberAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:volume28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:pagination439-41lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:dateRevised2010-3-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8496038-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:articleTitleEffect of contrast material osmolality on the electrocardiogram during intrauterine injection.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:affiliationDivision of Cardiology, Rebecca Sieff Hospital, Safed, Israel.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8496038pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed