Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8483704rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8483704lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026336lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8483704lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516769lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8483704lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1880157lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8483704lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514583lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:dateCreated1993-6-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:abstractTextA formal approach to the phenomenon of perceptual grouping by proximity was investigated. Grouping judgments of random dot patterns were made by the CODE algorithm (van Oeffelen & Vos, 1982) and several related algorithms, and these judgments were compared with subjects' grouping judgments for the same stimuli. Each algorithm predicted significantly more subject judgments than would be expected by chance. The more subjects agreed on how a given dot pattern should be grouped, the more successful was the algorithms' ability to match the judgments for that pattern. CODE predicted significantly fewer subject judgments than did some of the other algorithms, largely because of its overemphasis on the extent of interactivity among dots as they are being grouped.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:citationSubsetClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:monthAprlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:issn0031-5117lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LoganG DGDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ComptonB JBJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:volume53lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:pagination403-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8483704-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8483704-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8483704-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8483704-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8483704-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8483704-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8483704-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8483704-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:articleTitleEvaluating a computational model of perceptual grouping by proximity.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign 61820.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8483704pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8483704lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8483704lld:pubmed