Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8474300rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0000726lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8474300lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522662lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8474300lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205245lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8474300lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8474300lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0728733lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8474300lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0185023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8474300lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:dateCreated1993-5-20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:abstractTextWe report our results with abdominal rectopexy (modified Ripstein procedure, Ripstein/Corman) without resection of the colon in 63 patients using lyophylized dura-strips, Vicryl gauze or Dexon gauze, as the underlying fixation material for the mobilized rectum, presacral fascia and fixation suture material. Forty-five of 64 patients (71.4%) were reevaluated by proctoscopic examination and questioning; the mean follow-up time was 52.5 months (range 3-136 months). Postoperative mortality due to the method was 0%; the mortality was 1.6% (n = 1/63) in general for the first postoperative 30-day period as a result of cardiac complications. There were three complications (4.7%) the durating operation. Postoperative morbidity was 25.4% (16/63); infectious complications occurred in 12.7% (8/63) of cases, with one case of spontaneous closure of a pelvicutaneous fistula after intraoperative injury to the rectal wall. Full-thickness rectal prolapse appeared after rectopexy in 4.4% (2/45) (dura material alone) and mucosal prolapse was seen in 15.5% (7/45) of the follow-up group. Constipation was reduced by 28.6% (18/63) to 22.2% during the follow-up. Seventeen of 28 patients (60.7%) with incontinence showed an improvement; total continence was registered in 35.7% (10/28). The increase in continence as a result of abdominal rectopexy was significant (Wilcoxon, P = 0.05). The special aspects of being in an older age group, having a long history of procidentia, the number of deliveries, the length of the preoperative incontinence period all showed no influence on the postoperative degree of continence (Spearman's rank correlation). In 7/15 cases with persisting incontinence after rectopexy, postanal repair (Parks) was efficient in 7/7 cases leading to total or partial continence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:issn0023-8236lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FischerRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BünteHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HolzgreveAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WindeGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ReersBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BohlmannAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:volume378lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:pagination86-91lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8474300-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:articleTitle[Clinical and functional results of abdominal rectopexy using different fixation principles].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:affiliationKlinik und Poliklinik für Allgemeine Chirurgie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Münster.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8474300pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed