Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8441029rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031268lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018787lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205160lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1446409lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2350390lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032743lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040399lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205210lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0303322lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:dateCreated1993-3-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:abstractTextIn a previous comparison of 202 consecutive patients who underwent myocardial perfusion imaging with both 201Tl SPECT and 82Rb PET, 27 patients were identified as having true-positive 82Rb images, but false-negative 201Tl images. The purpose of this report is to determine the effect of correct image interpretation of coronary artery disease on the final management of those patients and compare it to the previous management scheme wherein a negative image was usually accepted as the end point unless clinical symptoms dictated otherwise. A follow-up study of the clinical course and outcome of these studies showed that 63% (17/27) of the patients with a true-positive 82Rb PET image were recommended for revascularization procedures. It is doubtful that this majority of patients would have received either surgical or interventional management based on the false-negative 201Tl SPECT procedure alone.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:monthMarlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:issn0161-5505lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CookS ASAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SahaG BGBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HOR WRWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MacIntyreW...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LAMBT WTWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AntarM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NeumannD RDRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:pagination400-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8441029-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:articleTitleClinical outcome of cardiac patients with negative thallium-201 SPECT and positive rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH 44195-5074.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8441029pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8441029lld:pubmed