| pubmed-article:8438595 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0543467 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0012356 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1522318 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0012359 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0741847 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1993-3-23 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:abstractText | 342 consecutive patients with recurrent angina pectoris were investigated 4.9 +/- 2.9 years after bypass surgery. According to the respective coronary morphology, angioplasty (PTCA) was performed in 110 patients (32%), repeat surgery in 32 (9%) and 200 patients (58%) were treated medically. Angioplasty was undertaken in 113 native coronary arteries (18 via a patent venous graft) and 29 bypass grafts. One vessel was dilated in 84 patients (76%) and more than one vessel in 26 patients (24%), giving an average of 1.3 vessels per patient. The initial success rate was 84% (120 of 142 vessels). The success rate varied from 60% in the midportion of venous grafts to 100% in the bypass protected left main stem. One patient died from complications (0.9%) and 5 patients (4.5%) suffered a myocardial infarction. Revascularisation was complete in 64 patients (58%) and remained incomplete in 40 patients. Clinical state improved in all but 7 patients and 70 patients (64%) became symptom-free. After 6 months 88 patients were clinically reevaluated. 52 patients (59%) still showed improvement in anginal status or remained symptom-free. Due to recurrent symptoms a re-angioplasty was performed on 21 patients and 6 patients had to be reoperated. In conclusion, coronary angioplasty is frequently a feasible alternative to reoperation with calculable risks in patients with recurrence of symptoms after prior bypass surgery. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:language | ger | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:issn | 0043-5325 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HofmannRR | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LeischFF | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KerschnerKK | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FelbermayrMM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:volume | 105 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:pagination | 17-20 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2010-11-18 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8438595-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:year | 1993 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:articleTitle | [Importance of coronary dilatation in patients after bypass operation]. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:affiliation | I. Medizinische Abteilung, Allgemeines Krankenhaus, Linz. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8438595 | pubmed:publicationType | English Abstract | lld:pubmed |
