Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8428104rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023903lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8428104lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0060933lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8428104lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0060934lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8428104lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8428104lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2711860lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8428104lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0166237lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:dateCreated1993-3-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:abstractTextA new hepatobiliary contrast agent for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl (EOB)-diethylemetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), was compared with Gd-DTPA to define the potential for improving tumor-liver contrast in a rodent liver adenocarcinoma model. With a T1-weighted spin-echo sequence, the contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) for tumor before contrast agent administration was 5 (arbitrary units), the tumor appearing slightly hypo-intense with respect to liver parenchyma. After Gd-DTPA injection (0.1 mmol/kg), tumor enhanced more strongly than liver, resulting in an equalization of tumor and liver signal intensities and a decline in C/N to zero at 3 minutes after injection. After Gd-EOB-DTPA injection (0.1 mmol/kg), liver enhanced more strongly than tumor. Five minutes after injection, C/N increased from 5 to 25 and remained above 17 for 50 minutes. The data indicate that Gd-EOB-DTPA yields higher and more prolonged tumor-liver contrast than Gd-DTPA on T1-weighted spin-echo images. The high liver-tumor contrast after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration should prove clinically advantageous for MR imaging detection of focal hepatic masses.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:issn1053-1807lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BraschR CRClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RosenauWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MühlerAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BerthezèneYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KuwatsuruRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VexlerV SVSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CleméntOOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:volume3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:pagination71-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8428104-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:articleTitleComparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of liver tumors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0628.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8428104pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed