Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8421972rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8421972lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8421972lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0027051lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8421972lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0679199lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8421972lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015260lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8421972lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0520997lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:dateCreated1993-2-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:abstractTextPredischarge supine bicycle ergometry was used to assess persistent myocardial ischemia in postinfarction patients who received thrombolytic therapy and were randomized to an invasive versus conservative strategy in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II trial. The frequency of ischemic responses in both strategies, and the 1-year prognostic importance of the different exercise test outcomes were examined. At 14 days, the percentage of patients with any adverse outcome (including death, presence of exercise-induced ST-segment depression, or inability to perform the exercise test) was 33.7% of 1,681 randomly assigned to the invasive strategy compared with 34.6% of 1,658 randomly assigned to the conservative strategy (p = 0.57). The 1-year mortality was greater in patients who did not perform the predischarge exercise test (7.7%) than in those who did (1.8%) (p < 0.001); the former were older, and a greater proportion were women, had a more frequent history of myocardial infarction, and more extensive coronary artery disease (p < 0.01 for each comparison). The 1-year mortality in patients with exercise-induced ST-segment depression or chest pain was only 1.4% (3 of 22) among those randomly assigned to the conservative strategy where coronary angiography and revascularization were recommended if the test result was abnormal (relative risk compared with those without ST-segment depression or chest pain 0.6; 99% confidence interval 0.1 to 2.9).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:issn0002-9149lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BraunwaldEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChaitmanB RBRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KnatterudG...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeinerD ADAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TerrinMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SopkoGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McMahonR PRPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YounisL TLTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FrederickM...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShawL JLJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:volume71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:pagination131-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8421972-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:articleTitleImpact of treatment strategy on predischarge exercise test in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II Trial.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:affiliationTIMI Coordinating Center, Maryland Medical Research Institute, Inc., Baltimore 21210.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8421972pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8421972lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8421972lld:pubmed