| pubmed-article:8362770 | pubmed:abstractText | In 66 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), exercise electrocardiography (ECG), exercise echocardiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography (dosage, 5 to 40 micrograms/kg/min), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using methoxy-isobutyl-isonitrile (MIBI) and coronary angiography were performed prospectively to compare methods for detecting CAD. CAD was defined as 70% luminal area stenosis in at least 1 coronary artery at coronary angiography. Significant CAD was present in 50 patients. Compared with exercise ECG, exercise echocardiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography and MIBI-SPECT had a significantly higher sensitivity (52% vs 80, 79 and 89%; p < 0.01, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in sensitivity between exercise echocardiography, dobutamine stress echocardiography and MIBI-SPECT. Specificity of MIBI-SPECT was lowest (71%), whereas exercise ECG, exercise and dobutamine echocardiography had higher specificities (93, 87 and 81%, respectively). Significance, however, was not achieved. Differences in overall accuracy between exercise echocardiography (82%), dobutamine stress echocardiography (80%) and MIBI-SPECT (85%) were not significant. Comparison with accuracy of exercise ECG (62%) was significant (p < 0.05, p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively). In 1-vessel disease, exercise ECG had a lower sensitivity (45%) than exercise and dobutamine echocardiography and MIBI-SPECT (79, 78 and 84%; p < 0.02, p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, respectively). Regarding the 24 patients with false-negative exercise ECG results, 67% had positive exercise echocardiography findings, 71% positive dobutamine echocardiography results and 84% positive technetium-99m MIBI-SPECT results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) | lld:pubmed |
