Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8355156rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034991lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8355156lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0184898lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8355156lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023311lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8355156lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007389lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8355156lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8355156lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8355156lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0234621lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8355156lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0456389lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:dateCreated1993-9-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:abstractTextOne hundred fifty-one unilateral cataract patients were randomly assigned to receive either a one-piece Staar AA-4203 silicone intraocular lens inserted through a 3.5 mm incision, an loptex 5 mm x 6 mm oval optic lens inserted through a 5.5 mm incision, or an AMO three-piece modified C-loop 6.0 round optic poly(methyl methacrylate) lens inserted through a 6.5 mm incision. Follow-up was 97% at two days postoperatively and 84% at one week and two months postoperatively. At one week postoperatively, 62% of 3.5 mm incision cases had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better compared with 33% of 5.5 mm (P < .01) and 43% of 6.5 mm incision cases. At two months postoperatively, 85% of 3.5 mm incision cases had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better compared with 64% of 6.5 mm (P < .05) and 71% of 5.5 mm incision cases. The 3.5 mm incision cases had significantly less total keratometric cylinder than other cases at all postoperative examinations (P < or = .001) and less surgically induced cylinder at two days and one week post-operatively (P < or = .02). The 5.5 mm and 6.5 mm incision cases did not differ significantly in visual acuity or astigmatism at any examination.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:issn0886-3350lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AnwarMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SalasAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorpubmed-author:el-MaghrabyAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MarzoukyAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GazayerliEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BallewCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorpubmed-author:el-SayyadFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MatheenMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:volume19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:pagination494-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8355156-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:articleTitleEffect of incision size on early postoperative visual rehabilitation after cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:affiliationEl-Maghraby Eye Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8355156pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8355156lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8355156lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8355156lld:pubmed