Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8350838rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1257890lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8350838lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0684224lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8350838lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332157lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8350838lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521828lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8350838lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038951lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:dateCreated1993-9-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:abstractTextFluoroscopic procedures, in general, result in much higher exposures to patients than do most types of radiographic procedures [National Council on Radiation Protection, Report 100, p. 31 (1989)]. In spite of this, fluoroscopic exposure rates can vary widely between systems, and often for no apparent reason. The charge of AAPM Task Group No. 11 was to evaluate fluoroscopic exposure rates at the entrant surface of the x-ray image intensifier, and to disseminate this information so that medical physicists could compare their own exposure rate measurements with typical values. The measurement protocol was defined for various system configurations. Sheets of copper were used to attenuate the x-ray beam, and the input exposure rate at the image intensifier (at the input mode closest to 23-cm diameter) in the absence of a scattering medium was determined. With 2 mm of copper as x-ray beam filtration, the median fluoroscopic exposure rate at the image intensifier was found to be 16.5 nC/kg/s (64.0 microR/s), with an average kV of 77 and mA of 2.0 (n = 62).lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:issn0094-2405lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChoH YHYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShepardJ SJSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RossiR PRPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ConwayB JBJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BooneJ MJMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StraussK JKJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PfeifferD EDElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:volume20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:pagination789-94lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8350838-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8350838-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8350838-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8350838-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:articleTitleA survey of fluoroscopic exposure rates: AAPM Task Group No. 11 Report.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento 95817.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8350838pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8350838lld:pubmed