Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8318443rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009649lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8318443lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0015726lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8318443lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242568lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:dateCreated1993-8-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:abstractTextThe present study investigated whether phobics show an illusory correlation (IC) between phobia-relevant stimuli and aversive events. Nineteen treated and 19 untreated spider phobics were exposed to a series of 72 slides. Three different categories were used: Phobia-relevant slides (spiders), alternative fear-relevant slides (weapons), and neutral slides (flowers). Slides were randomly paired with either a shock, a siren, or nothing at all. All slide/outcome combinations occurred equally frequently. A posteriori recorded contingency estimates indicated that untreated phobics dramatically overestimate the covariation of spiders and shock. On-line recorded outcome expectancies revealed that the bias to overestimate the spider-shock contingency is highly resistant to extinction. The covariation bias was accompanied by differentially heightened electrodermal first interval responses (FIR) and unconditioned electrodermal responses (third interval responses: TIR) on phobia-relevant trials. Treated phobics did not show a covariation bias, indicating that such bias can be modulated by behavioral treatment. The present findings sustain the hypothesis that phobic subjects process information in a fear-confirming way.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:issn1053-881Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:authorpubmed-author:de JongP JPJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MerckelbachHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:volume28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:pagination167-70lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8318443-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:articleTitleCovariation bias, classical conditioning, and phobic fear.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Mental Health Sciences, Limburg University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8318443pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed