Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8295814rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008059lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8295814lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0087111lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8295814lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0271429lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8295814lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007537lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8295814lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0055856lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8295814lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038960lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:issue12 Suppl 3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:dateCreated1994-3-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:abstractTextThe safety and efficacy of a new oral suspension formulation of clarithromycin were evaluated in this multicenter, Phase III, single blind, comparative trial in 379 children ages 6 months to 12 years with signs or symptoms of acute otitis media. Children were randomized to receive a 10-day course of clarithromycin oral suspension (7.5 mg/kg; maximum, 500 mg) or cefaclor oral suspension (20 mg/kg; maximum, 500 mg) twice daily. Specific clinical response criteria were developed based on pretreatment signs and symptoms and results of tympanometry. Of the 379 enrolled patients 281 (74%) were evaluable (clarithromycin, 150; cefaclor, 131). There were no demographic differences between the two groups. Fifty percent of the patients had 2 to 4 episodes of otitis media (including the current episode) in the past 12 months; 63% of the patients had an infection of moderate severity. Clarithromycin and cefaclor suspensions were similarly effective for the treatment of acute otitis media. Clinical success (cure, cure with effusion or improvement) was achieved in 86% of clarithromycin-treated patients and 90% of cefaclor-treated patients. The majority of bacterial isolates for which susceptibility results were available were fully or moderately susceptible to the study drugs (96% clarithromycin, 92% cefaclor). Both drugs were well-tolerated; adverse events considered probably study drug-related were reported by 30 (15%) of clarithromycin recipients and 31 (17%) of cefaclor recipients. There were no significant differences between the groups in the numbers of patients reporting events that were thought to be related to study medication.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:issn0891-3668lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoochW MWM3rdlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GanV NVNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KhuranaC MCMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CorderW TWTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AndrewsW...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:volume12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:paginationS128-33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8295814-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:articleTitleClarithromycin and cefaclor suspensions in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Pathology, Primary Children's Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84113.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8295814pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Trial, Phase IIIlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8295814lld:pubmed