| pubmed-article:8279456 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0206161 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0020058 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0220825 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205554 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2347947 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0150312 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1994-2-10 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:abstractText | An automated reticulocyte procedure using a flow cytometer and the fluorescent dye thiazole orange was evaluated for clinical use. The mean reticulocyte count on 118 hematologically healthy adults was 1.56% (standard deviation [SD] 0.54), with virtually no difference in percentage between women and men. The mean absolute values were 68.4 x 10(9)/L (SD 24.6) and 75.7 x 10(9)/L (SD 27.2), respectively. When compared with the standard microscopic technique, the automated method showed excellent correlation (r = 0.98) and greatly improved precision (coefficient of variation [CV] 4.1%) over the manual method (CV 22.8%). Preanalytic storage of blood samples at 4 degrees C for up to 48 hours did not significantly affect results, nor did varying the incubation time of diluted samples from 1/2 to 2 hours. In a group of patients with appreciable numbers of Howell-Jolly bodies, automated reticulocyte counts were spuriously elevated. The difference between the manual and automated counts on these patients approximated the percentage of Howell-Jolly bodies observed on their Wright-Giemsa stained blood smears. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:citationSubset | AIM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:month | Jan | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:issn | 0002-9173 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LofsnessK GKG | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KohnkeM LML | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GeierN ANA | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:volume | 101 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:pagination | 85-90 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:8279456-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:year | 1994 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:articleTitle | Evaluation of automated reticulocyte counts and their reliability in the presence of Howell-Jolly bodies. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:8279456 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
