Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:8238220rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0229094lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8238220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040574lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8238220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023311lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8238220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016360lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8238220lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282545lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:dateCreated1993-12-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:abstractTextSubconjunctival 5-fluorouracil has been an effective adjunct in glaucoma filtering surgery. We investigated the effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil in primary trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation (glaucoma triple procedure). Seventy-four patients were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups to receive either no 5-fluorouracil (control patients) or low-dose 5-fluorouracil (mean total dose, 24.8 mg; mean number of injections, 5.0 +/- 1.3). The mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 20.1 +/- 5.4 mm Hg for the 5-fluorouracil group and 21.0 +/- 5.2 mm Hg for the control group (P = .48, Student's unpaired t-test). The mean number of medications was 2.2 +/- 1.0 and 2.0 +/- 1.0 (P = .49, Mann Whitney U test), respectively. At all postoperative visits, there were no statistically significant differences in mean intraocular pressures between the two groups. Mean follow-up was 13.2 months for 5-fluorouracil-treated patients and 15.0 months for control patients. At the last postoperative visit, mean intraocular pressures were 15.4 +/- 3.7 mm Hg and 15.0 +/- 5.0 mm Hg, respectively (P = .45, Student's unpaired t-test). Both groups showed comparable visual outcome (20/40 or better in 31 of 38 5-fluorouracil-treated patients [82%] vs 32 of 36 control patients [89%]) and a decrease in number of medications needed, 0.7 +/- 1.0 and 0.7 +/- 0.9, respectively (P = .96, Mann Whitney U test). Thus, 5-fluorouracil administered as in our study did not seem to have any effect in primary trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:issn0002-9394lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ShinD HDHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JuzychM SMSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SwendrisR PRPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:O'GradyJ MJMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LemonL CLClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:day15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:volume116lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:pagination594-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:8238220-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:articleTitleTrabeculectomy, phacoemulsification, and posterior chamber lens implantation with and without 5-fluorouracil.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:affiliationKresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:8238220pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8238220lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8238220lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:8238220lld:pubmed